The following are a list of "peak-shelf" resource that have been hand-picked by our library team around this topic. If you would like additional research assistance on this topic, delight contact our help desk. They accept access to specialized databases and thousands of resources yous won't observe online. Click on a heading beneath to scan resources in that section.
This Particular is open up in the accordion:
The Processing and Treatment of Mentally Sick Persons in the Criminal Justice System: A Scan of Practice and Groundwork Analysis
The Processing and Treatment of Mentally Sick Persons in the Criminal Justice System: A Scan of Exercise and Groundwork Analysis
This "groundwork analysis examines how individuals with mental disease are processed and treated in the criminal justice organization and discusses the implications of insufficient or inadequate intendance for these individuals. In detail, the main objectives of this paper are to review current practice in the processing of mentally ill offenders, assess societal and economic costs associated with recidivism and bereft intendance for this population, and highlight promising strategies to tackle challenges involved in the reintegration of mentally ill offenders into order" (p. 1). Sections following an executive summary are: introduction; enquiry objective and focus—severe mental disease among individuals involved in the criminal justice organisation; information and methodology; findings related to the telescopic of the problem, costs associated with managing mentally ill individuals in the criminal justice system, current do and policy, and criminal justice programs and interventions for mentally ill individuals; research and policy recommendations; and decision.
TIP 59: Improving Cultural Competence
TIP 59: Improving Cultural Competence
"The evolution of culturally responsive clinical skills is vital to the effectiveness of behavioral health services. According to the U.S. Department of Health and Man Services (HHS), cultural competence "refers to the ability to laurels and respect the beliefs, languages, interpersonal styles, and behaviors of individuals and families receiving services, equally well as staff members who are providing such services … This Treatment Improvement Protocol (TIP) uses Sue's (2001) multidimensional model for developing cultural competence. Adapted to address cultural competence beyond behavioral health settings, this model serves every bit a frame-work for targeting three organizational levels of treatment: private advisor and staff, clinical and programmatic, and organizational and authoritative. The chapters target specific racial, indigenous, and cultural considerations along with the core elements of cultural competence highlighted in the model. These core elements include cultural sensation, general cultural noesis, cultural noesis of behavioral health, and cultural skill development. The chief objective of this TIP is to assist readers in understanding the role of civilisation in the delivery of behavioral health services (both generally and with reference to specific cultural groups)" (p. xv). These half-dozen chapters follow an executive summary: introduction to cultural competence; core competencies for counselors and other clinical staff; culturally responsible evaluation and treatment planning; preparing organizational cultural competence; behavioral health handling for major racial and ethnic groups—African and Black Americans, Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians, and other Pacific Islanders, Hispanics and Latinos, Native Americans, and White Americans ; drug cultures and culture of recovery. Appendixes included: Instruments to Measure out Identity and Acculturation; Tools for Accessing Cultural Competence; Screening and Cess Instruments; Cultural Conception in Diagnosis and Cultural Concepts of Distress; Cultural Resources; and glossary.
Interventions for Adult Offenders With Serious Mental Illness
Interventions for Developed Offenders With Serious Mental Illness
This report is a great introduction to strategies for treating offenders with serious mental illness (i.east., schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, or major depression) in jails, prisons, forensic hospitals, or community reentry programs. The researchers "identified some promising treatments for individuals with serious mental illness during incarceration or during transition from incarceration to customs settings. Treatment with antipsychotics other than clozapine appears to improve psychiatric symptoms more than clozapine in an incarceration setting. Two interventions, discharge planning with Medicaid-application aid and integrated dual disorder treatment programs, appear to exist constructive interventions for seriously mentally ill offenders transitioning back to the community" (p. seven).
The Treatment of Persons with Mental Illness in Prisons and Jails: A State Survey
The Handling of Persons with Mental Illness in Prisons and Jails: A State Survey
"Prisons and jails have become America'southward "new asylums": The number of individuals with serious mental illness in prisons and jails now exceeds the number in state psychiatric hospitals tenfold. Most of the mentally ill individuals in prisons and jails would have been treated in the land psychiatric hospitals in the years before the deinstitutionalization movement led to the closing of the hospitals, a trend that continues even today. The handling of mentally ill individuals in prisons and jails is critical, peculiarly since such individuals are vulnerable and oft driveling while incarcerated. Untreated, their psychiatric illness often gets worse, and they go out prison or jail sicker than when they entered. Individuals in prison and jails have a correct to receive medical care, and this right pertains to serious mental disease just every bit it pertains to tuberculosis, diabetes, or hypertension. This right to handling has been affirmed past the U.S. Supreme Court … [this report] is the first national survey of such treatment practices. It focuses on the problem of treating seriously mentally ill inmates who refuse treatment, commonly because they lack awareness of their own illness and do not call back they are sick. What are the handling practices for these individuals in prisons and jails in each state? What are the consequences if such individuals are not treated?" (p. 6). This publication is divided into four parts: history of the trouble—whether we take learned anything in 200 years; legal background for treating mentally sick persons in prisons and jails; the state survey results; and findings and recommendations.
Coming Dwelling house from Prison: Family Matters
Coming Domicile from Prison: Family Matters
Access to keynote remarks, comments, Q and A, presentations, and handouts from a seminar on the bear upon of families on community reentry are available at this website. "Families as sources of back up, conflict and domestic violence, parent-child relationships, and parole practices and expectations are amidst the topics covered" (p. ane). Based primarily on research conducted with men returning habitation from prison house and their wives and girlfriends, Dr. Creasie Finney Hairston (UIC) provides an overview of how families experience and manage customs reentry. The presentation describes the bear on of incarceration and community reentry on family relationships. Families as sources of back up, conflict and domestic violence, parent-child relationships, and parole practices and expectations are among the topics covered. Comments are provided by Stephen Gavazzi (OSU); Kim Hettel (GOFBCI); and Rachael Woldoff (WVU).
Effective Prison Mental Health Services: Guidelines to Expand and Improve Treatment
Constructive Prison Mental Health Services: Guidelines to Expand and Improve Treatment
"[H]istorical , legal, and ethical issues relevant to dealing with mental illness in the field of corrections" are discussed (p. 3). Chapters include: introduction; screening and assessment; mental health and substance abuse treatment; employ of seclusion, segregation, and restraints; suicide prevention; treating women offenders; psychopharmacological intervention for psychiatric disorders; transitional services; handling of special populations (e.yard., persons with mental retardation or developmental disability, violent offenders, sexual activity offenders, and older adults); and profiles of iii states (Maryland, Oregon, and Texas).
0 Response to "How Data Analysis Is Utilized To Identify Mentally-ill Offenders"
Post a Comment